Our
dojo meets inside a Temple. They’re in
the process of renting out space to a day care center, who must meet strict
County standards. A sign was posted in
various parts of the building, declaring it a gun-free zone. Graffiti on one of the signs sums the argument
up perfectly. This all got me thinking:
- Many
of these mass shooters are loners, self-isolated from others to brood on their
own.
- Many
mass shooters bought their guns legally.
- Law
enforcement and military train regularly to handle their weapons safely and
effectively.
- Even
on the opposing side, militia and survivalists train together.
Here’s
a thought – legal gun owners should be required by law to belong to an
NRA-approved gun club and attend regular meetings. The NRA and gun clubs should love this as
their active membership grows. The
Government should love this as gun owners would be regulated into controlled, safe
training. Gun owners should love this as
they’re socializing with like-minded people while practicing their safe shooting skills.
Registered gun owners who do not attend and practice regularly should be reported
to the authorities by the gun club.
Like
the Temple (a religious institution where like-minded people congregate to share
fellowship), fellow congregants (gun club members) can have direct, regular
contact with each other. They are in a
good position to see if a member’s mood goes dark, or they seem mentally imbalanced, and can report it to the
club, who can alert the authorities. Basic
human contact is the best way to check on someone’s mental status. Is this foolproof? Nothing is foolproof. Don’t tell me banning guns is foolproof because
those who break the law by murder are not concerned that obtaining a gun is
illegal.
Is
this idea the solution? No, nothing is guaranteed to stop the
problem, but if one disturbed person gets help, if one shooting is avoided, it’s
worth examining.